Skip to main content

Article 51/2025

What alternative claim(s) exist in delict to a statutory automatically unfair dismissal, a statutory constructive dismissal and a statutory unfair discrimination claim?
_____________________________________

  1. A statutory automatically unfair dismissal cause of action exists in terms of s187(1)(f) of the LRA. A statutory cause of action, based upon a constructive dismissal, exists in terms of s186(1)(e) of the LRA. A statutory unfair discrimination cause of action exists in terms of s6(3) of the EEA.
  2. What are the alternative civil claims that exist in delict?
  3. The first claim is based on the actio legis aquiliae – negligent (culpa), or intentional (dolus) and wrongful causing of patrimonial damage (pecuniary damage) is covered in this action.
  4. An alternative or simultaneous claim may also be based on the actio iniuriarum – the intentional (dolus animus iniuriandi) infringement of the interest of personality is covered by means of this cause of action and is instituted to recover sentimental damages (solatium).
  5. Under both the aforesaid actions, the claimant would be entitled to damages, if successful, to the extent proven.

See, in general, Erasmus v Dr Beyers Naude Local Municipality (2021) 42 ILJ 1545 (ECG), (2021) 32 SALLR 6 (ECG).

The previous article dealt with the distinction between misconduct constituting desertion and misconduct constituting abscondment – see, further, in this regard, Okhahlamba Local Municipality v Mabuya (2021) 32 SALLR 12 (LC).

In this article, what we attempt to do is provide some clarity as to a very different misconduct, namely, the misconduct of deeming desertion.

What is the difference between desertion and abscondment?

We think that everyone understands that an employer is vicariously liable for the wrong committed (an act or omission) by its employee during the course/scope/sphere of employment/engagement in any activity reasonably incidental to it.

But, what is the extent of an employer’s vicarious liability where the employee commits a wrong on his or her own volition?