Skip to main content

Article 27/2026

Where do delictual claims fit into dispute resolution options applicable to employment disputes?

_____________________________________

  • It is well-established that a statutory claim based upon an automatically unfair dismissal is to be dealt with in terms of s187(1)(f) of the LRA – it is equally well-established that a statutory constructive dismissal claim is to be dealt with in terms of s186(1)(e) of the LRA.
  • Likewise, it is well-established that a statutory unfair discrimination claim is to be dealt with in terms of s6(3) of the EEA.
  • What are the alternative civil claims that exist in delict as to the above three statutory claims?

There are two claims grounded in delict covering both patrimonial and sentimental damages:

  • the first claim is the actio legis aquiliae – this claim covers the negligent (culpa) or intentional (dolus) and wrongful causing of patrimonial (pecuniary) damages
  • the second claim is the actio iniuriarum – this claim covers the intentional (dolus animus iniuriandi) infringement of the interest of personality – i e instituted for the recovery of sentimental damages (solatium)
  • in respect of both the aforesaid delictual claims, the claimant is entitled to damages to the extent that such damages have been proven

It is also well-established that an aggrieved employee, in the above circumstances, is entitled to institute action based on both statutory and delictual causes.

The previous article dealt with the distinction between misconduct constituting desertion and misconduct constituting abscondment – see, further, in this regard, Okhahlamba Local Municipality v Mabuya (2021) 32 SALLR 12 (LC).

In this article, what we attempt to do is provide some clarity as to a very different misconduct, namely, the misconduct of deeming desertion.

What is the difference between desertion and abscondment?

We think that everyone understands that an employer is vicariously liable for the wrong committed (an act or omission) by its employee during the course/scope/sphere of employment/engagement in any activity reasonably incidental to it.

But, what is the extent of an employer’s vicarious liability where the employee commits a wrong on his or her own volition?