Article 43/2022

What are the grounds for the setting aside a writ of execution?

_____________________________________

A writ of execution must be strictly in compliance with the wording of the order from which the judgment debt arises.  If a judgment debtor disputes liability for the amounts reflected in the writ on the grounds that it has paid the amounts, or part of them, or because it contends that it is not liable for them on the ground that they were not within the scope of the judgment, it may apply to court for relief (Butchard v Butchard 1996 (2) SA 581 (W), at 587).

In terms of s34(1) of the BCEA, an employer may not make deductions from an employee’s remuneration unless, subject to s34(2), the employee agrees, in writing, or the deduction is made in terms of a law, collective agreement, court order or arbitration award.

A case is moot and therefore not justiciable if it no longer presents an existing or live controversy. With reference to National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others [1999] ZACC 17; 2000 (2) SA 1 (CC), how did the supreme court of appeal, in Mhlontlo Local Municipality and Others v Ngcangula and Another (2024) 35 SALLR 132 (SCA) recently deal with this issue?

The principle underlying the doctrine of peremption is that no person can be allowed to take up two positions inconsistent with one another, or, as is commonly expressed, to blow hot and cold, to approbate and reprobate when considering pursuing litigation. With reference to Qoboshiyane NO v Avusa Publishing Eastern Cape [2012] ZASCA 166; 2013 (3) SA 315 (SCA), what is the test to be applied to determine whether or not a party has perempted its right to institute legal proceedings?