Article 40/2025

Is it a requirement that each page of an affidavit must be initialled?

Is it a requirement that every page of every annexure to an affidavit must be initialled?

_____________________________________

The LC, in Ellsworth John O’Connor v LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd (2024) 35 SALLR 124 (LC), had the following to say in respect of the above questions:

  • it pointed out that in casu, while the founding affidavit had been properly commissioned on the last page, every other page had not been initialled by either the applicant or the commissioner
  • the LC was, however, satisfied that there was no defect in the founding affidavit because, on the authority of Minister of Safety and Security and Others v Mohamed and Another (2) [2010] 4 All SA 538 (WCC), at [26], initialling every page is not a requirement for the validity of an affidavit
  • in the LC’s viewpoint, initialling every page of an affidavit certainly represents best practice, because it gives the court confidence that the words used in the affidavit are really those of the deponent – however, initialling every page of the annexures also appeared to be unnecessary, as the other party would always be free to dispute the authenticity of those documents, whether they were initialled or not
June 26, 2025

The first leg of the test to determine whether or not urgency exists, when an urgent application is brought, requires a court to assess whether an urgent hearing is necessary because the applicant will not be able to obtain substantial redress in the normal course.

June 19, 2025

Previous articles this year dealt with a zero-tolerance policy when tested positively for alcohol or drugs, as well as a zero-tolerance policy in respect of having tested positive for cannabis. In short, the courts hold the viewpoint that, by means of such policies, an employer is not permitted to create an absolute ‘no go zone’ and, furthermore, held that, at all given times, one of the fundamental questions to be asked, irrespective of the content of such zero-tolerance policy, is the effect of the drugs/alcohol/cannabis on the ability of the employee to do his/her job.

June 12, 2025

an employer questioned a medical certificate of an employee and held the viewpoint that it did not have an obligation to pay the employee during the period of sick leave, seeing that the certificate did not state that the employee was unable to work for the duration of the absence on account of sickness or injury..