Skip to main content

Article 22/2022

What is the difference between contractual, statutory and collective agreement rights and obligations?

_____________________________________

Statutory rights and obligations

  1. these types of disputes are created by statute and concern an alleged statutory unfair dismissal or an alleged statutory unfair labour practice;
  2. the employee is entitled to claim reinstatement, re-employment or compensation;
  3. the CCMA and labour court have jurisdiction to determine these disputes concerning the unfair conduct of an employer in terms of, inter alia, s193, s194 and s195 of the LRA

Contractual rights and obligations

  1. these disputes concern the alleged breach of a contract, excluding a collective agreement;
  2. the claimant’s claim is for damages, compensation or specific performance;
  3. the labour court and high court have concurrent jurisdiction in terms of s77(3) and s77A(e) of the BCEA;
  4. the claimant targets the unlawful conduct of the respondent and, if indeed it is a dismissal matter, a declaration that same is unlawful and ab initio void;

Collective agreement

  1. here the cause of action is the breach of such agreement and the remedy is set out in s24 of the LRA;
  2. s77(3) and s77A(e) of the BCEA are not applicable.
August 17, 2026

We think that everyone understands that an employer is vicariously liable for the wrong committed (an act or omission) by its employee during the course/scope/sphere of employment/engagement in any activity reasonably incidental to it.

But, what is the extent of an employer’s vicarious liability where the employee commits a wrong on his or her own volition?

August 10, 2026

What is the content of traditional consensus to indicate that an agreement exists between an employer and an employee?

If, on the traditional theory of consensus, a party fails to prove an agreement upon which it relies, with reference to Sonap Petroleum SA (Pty) Ltd v Pappadogianis 1992 (3) SA 234 (A), on what basis can a finding be made that quasi-mutual assent exists, founded on the approach that a party is precluded from denying the existence of an agreement based on their own conduct and the circumstances?

What does the three-fold enquiry entail to determine the presence of quasi-mutual assent?

In determining whether an agreement has been reached in the absence of traditional consensus, but on the basis of quasi-mutual assent, what is the extent of the duty on the party wishing to rely on such an agreement to, on the basis of reasonableness, enquire as to the contradictions that exist in the position of the other party so contained in correspondence?

August 3, 2026

Where do delictual claims fit into dispute resolution options applicable to employment disputes?