Article 9/2022

In assessing damages for loss of earnings or support suffered by an ex-employee, with reference to a delictual as opposed to a labour law claim, it is usual for a deduction to be made for contingencies as well as general contingencies for which no explicit allowance has been made in the actuarial calculations.  What are contingencies and what is the approach to be adopted in respect of general contingencies?

_____________________________________

  • contingencies are ‘the art of foretelling the future’ – however, general rules have been established: the younger a claimant, the more time he or she has to fall prey to changes and uncertainties of life, such as a downturn in the economy, leading to a reduction in salary, retrenchment, unemployment, ill-health, death, etc; the longer the remaining working life, the more likely the possibility of an unforeseen event impacting on the assumed trajectory of the person’s remaining career – as a general principle, in a pre-morbid scenario, the younger the age of the claimant, the higher the contingency
  • In Road Accident Fund v Guedes 2006 (5) SA 583 (SCA), the court referred with approval to The Quantum Yearbook, by R Koch, under the heading ‘General contingencies’, where it states that when ‘…assessing damages for loss of earnings or support, it is usual for a deduction to be made for general contingencies for which no explicit allowance has been made in the actuarial calculation. The deduction is the prerogative of the court…’.

_____________________________________

  • contingencies are ‘the art of foretelling the future’ – however, general rules have been established: the younger a claimant, the more time he or she has to fall prey to changes and uncertainties of life, such as a downturn in the economy, leading to a reduction in salary, retrenchment, unemployment, ill-health, death, etc; the longer the remaining working life, the more likely the possibility of an unforeseen event impacting on the assumed trajectory of the person’s remaining career – as a general principle, in a pre-morbid scenario, the younger the age of the claimant, the higher the contingency
  • In Road Accident Fund v Guedes 2006 (5) SA 583 (SCA), the court referred with approval to The Quantum Yearbook, by R Koch, under the heading ‘General contingencies’, where it states that when ‘…assessing damages for loss of earnings or support, it is usual for a deduction to be made for general contingencies for which no explicit allowance has been made in the actuarial calculation. The deduction is the prerogative of the court…’.

What are the principles governing the vicarious liability of an employer for acts committed by an employee in breach of the EEA, in terms of s60 of the EEA?

The scenario is as follows: only employees working at a bakery and not employees working at a mill were party to the disputes when referred to conciliation.  At arbitration, the union wanted to join the employees working at the mill.

Is such joinder permissible?

What is the test for unfair discrimination formulated in Harksen v Lane and consistently applied subsequently by the various courts, including, recently, Premier FMCG (Pty) Ltd t/a Blue Ribbon Bakery v FAWU (2022) 33 SALLR 277 (LC); (2022) 43 ILJ 1584 (LC)?