Skip to main content

Article 50/2024

LabourEdge

What is the test for unfair discrimination formulated in Harksen v Lane and consistently applied subsequently by the various courts, including, recently, Premier FMCG (Pty) Ltd t/a Blue Ribbon Bakery v FAWU (2022) 33 SALLR 277 (LC); (2022) 43 ILJ 1584 (LC)?

_____________________________________

Step 1

  • Step 1 entails answering the question as to whether the act or omission differentiates between people or categories of people – a negative answer means that no discrimination has taken place and a positive answer permits the investigation to move to step 2.

Step 2

  • This step entails answering the question as to whether or not the differentiation amounts to discrimination.
  • If the differentiation is on a listed ground, discrimination has been established.
  • On the other hand, if the discrimination is on a non-listed ground, such ground must show attributes or characteristics with the potential to impair human dignity or affect human beings adversely in a comparably serious manner – if same is established, discrimination exists and, if same is not established, then no discrimination exists.

Step 3

  • This step entails answering the question as to whether or not the discrimination is unfair.
  • If the discrimination is on a listed ground, unfairness is presumed – unless the employer proves fairness.
  • If the discrimination is on a non-listed ground, unfairness is to be established – the test is the impact of the discrimination on the complainant and others in a similar position (if there is compliance with the test, then unfair discrimination has been established, but, on the other hand, if there is non-compliance with the test, fair discrimination exists).

Section 41(2) of the BCEA regulates the entitlement of an employee, dismissed for reasons based on the employer’s operational requirements, to severance pay.

In terms of s41(4) of the BCEA, an employee, who unreasonably refused to accept the employer’s offer of alternative employment with that employer or any other employer, is not entitled to severance pay ito s41(2).

How does the assistance provided by the retrenching employer to a retrenched employee affect such employee’s entitlement to severance pay?

What is the short test to be applied to determine whether there is compliance with the reasonable decision-maker test?

When determining whether or not the arbitrator of the CCMA or bargaining council behaved like a reasonable decision-maker, what are the ‘questions to be asked’?

What is the test recently applied to determine whether an arbitration award should be set aside on review?

In the scenario where a group of employees, participating in a demonstration, picket, strike, etc, are participating in unlawful conduct, but a number of other employees, who are also participating in such demonstration, picket, strike, etc, are not participating in such unlawful conduct, will the employer be entitled to obtain an interdict against both groups of such employees?