Skip to main content

Article 46/2025

If the cause of action is an alleged breach of an agreement, s77(3), read with s77A(e), of the BCEA is applicable, establishing the concurrent jurisdiction of the labour court and high court to determine the dispute (we have dealt with this scenario in previous articles).

On the other hand, if the cause of action is the alleged non-compliance with the required statutory unfairness so contained in the LRA, then the jurisdiction of the CCMA (and bargaining councils) and the labour court is established in terms of s191 of the LRA (previous articles also dealt with this issue).

But what about if the cause of action is based on a collective agreement?

_____________________________________

It is important to realise that s24 of the LRA is not applicable under all circumstances.

The SCA, in MEC for Economic Development, Environment and Tourism, Limpopo v Leboho (2022) 33 SALLR 281 (SCA); (2022) 43 ILJ 2695 (SCA), adopted the following approach:

  • if the cause of action concerns the interpretation of the collective agreement or, alternatively, entails an application issue of such collective agreement, then s24 of the LRA is applicable See, further, Tshambi v Hospersa (2016) 37 ILJ 1839 (LAC)
  • If, however, on the other hand, the cause of action centres around the enforcement of the collective agreement, or boils down to a compliance issue of the collective agreement, then the civil jurisdiction of the high court comes into play.

What are the principles governing common purpose misconduct?

What are the principles governing an employee’s duty to disclose to his/her employer information about misconduct?

In Article 31, we dealt with the distinction between desertion and abscondment.

In Article 32, we dealt with the misconduct of deeming desertion.

In this article, we will deal with termination of employment by operation of law in the private sector – similar to deeming to be discharged in the public sector.