Skip to main content

Article 40/2023

What are the remedies available to a successful applicant in an unfair labour practice dispute?

The following represents a summary of such remedies:

_____________________________________

s193(4) of the LRA

  • the arbitrator is required to:
    • determine the dispute on terms that are reasonable and
    • same may include reinstatement, re-employment or compensation

s193(2) of the LRA

  • the primary relief is reinstatement or re-employment, except:
    • where the employee does not so wish for it or
    • the continued employment relationship is intolerable or
    • it is not reasonably practicable to reinstate the employee or
    • the dismissal is only procedurally unfair

further application of s194(4) of the LRA

  • apart from being just and equitable in all circumstances, there is a cap of 12 months’ remuneration

calculation of awarding compensation

  • in awarding compensation, the following principles should be adhered to:
    • if compensation is awarded, it is indeed compensation for non-patrimonial loss
    • entailing that the jurisprudence relating to the award of a solatium in terms of the actio
      iniuriarum is relevant.

(Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Tshishonga (2009) 30 ILJ 1799 (LAC)

    • compensation is designed to ‘…compensate the employee who has suffered an attack on his or her dignity and reputation or an onslaught on his or her humanity’
    • taking into account the above, it is therefore not surprising that the following factors may be relevant in calculating the amount of compensation: the seriousness of the infringement on the dignity, the nature and extent of the publication, the reputation of the employee, motives and conduct of the employer

(see, further, Mogale and Others v Seima 2008 (5) SA 637 (SCA)

    • in awarding compensation, the following further guidelines should be adopted:
      • the award must attempt to place the employee in the position that he or she would have been had it not been for the unfair labour practice
      • there is also a duty on the employee to mitigate his or her loss

(see, further, Solidarity obo Kerns v Mudau NO (2007) 28 ILJ 1146 (LC), Ferodo (Pty) Ltd v
De Ruiter (1993) 14 ILJ 974 (LAC))

Precautionary suspensions

In the public sector, the Senior Management Service Handbook (SMS Handbook) directly addresses precautionary suspensions and the 60-day time limit.

Clause 2.7(2)(c) of the SMS Handbook provides that ‘If a member is suspended or transferred as a precautionary measure, the employer must hold a disciplinary hearing within 60 days. The chair of the hearing must then decide on any further postponement.’

Regulation 6 of the Local Government: Disciplinary Regulations Senior Managers, 2010 (Regulations) provides for the precautionary suspension of senior municipal employees and Regulation 6(6)(a) provides: ‘If a senior is suspended, a disciplinary hearing must commence within three months after the date of suspension, failing which the suspension will automatically lapse.’

What are the principles governing a determination of the question as to whether or not a senior municipal employee’s suspension automatically lapses in terms of the aforesaid Regulation 6(6)(a)?

Obviously, the answers to the aforesaid question are very relevant in the private sector where, firstly, a collective agreement regulates a similar process or, alternatively, such contractual rights have been created between the parties, to be enforced in terms of s77(3) of the BCEA.

In the previous article, we dealt with the consequences of a plant level collective agreement with a definite beginning and end date. We indicated to you that, in line with s23(2) of the LRA, and an analysis of the relevant case law, that, once such a collective agreement reaches its expiry date, it expires and is no longer of any force or effect. In this article, we deal with the scenario where a plant level collective agreement is concluded for an indefinite period and the employer gave notice to terminate same.

What are the consequences when a party to a plant level collective agreement, concluded for an indefinite time period, gives notice to terminate such collective agreement?

In terms of s23(2), a collective agreement binds, for the whole period of the collective agreement, every person so bound in terms of s23(1)(c) (the members of a registered trade union and the employers who are members of a registered employers’ organisation who are a party to the collective agreement, if the collective agreement regulates the terms and conditions of employment, or the conduct of the employers and employees) who was a member at the time it became binding, or who becomes a member after it became binding (irrespective of whether or not that person continues to be a member of such trade union or employers’ organisation for the duration of the collective agreement).

What is the relevant case law development as to a plant level collective agreement that has an expiry date, i e does such collective agreement continue to be of force and effect after such expiry date?