Skip to main content

Article 4/2025

In terms of s185(a) of the LRA, every employee has a right not to be unfairly dismissed. Does this right not to be unfairly dismissed translate into an automatic right to a remedy if it is found that the employee has been unfairly dismissed?

_____________________________________

The constitutional court, in McGregor v Public Health and Social Development Sectoral Bargaining Council (2021) 32 SALLR 33 (CC) (with reference to Kemp t/a
Centralmed v Rawlins (2009) 30 ILJ 2677 (LAC)) adopted the following approach:

  • every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed in terms of s185(a) of the LRA
  • not every infringement of a right entails that the employee has a right to a remedy – specifically, an award of compensation is never guaranteed
  • generally, compensation is only applicable if reinstatement or re-employment is precluded

See further, SARS v CCMA 2017 (1) SA 549 (CC)

Regulations 2 to 7 of Government Gazette 52515 of 15 April 2025 (Gazette 2) deal with equal pay for work of equal value. What is the approach to be followed in order to ensure compliance with the aforesaid Regulations?

Which principles regulate the choice of economically active population (EAP) where a designated employer operates in more than one province?

Which principles govern the election of EAP where the predominant/major part/ majority of the operations of the designated employer exist?

What are some of the more important duties of a designated employer, in terms of s19 of the Employment Equity Act (EEA), read together with Regulations 8 and 9 of the General Administrative Regulations (contained in Government Gazette 52515 of 15 April 2025)?