Skip to main content

Article 4/2024

LabourEdge

The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (‘LRA’) has created a statutory formula to be applied when dealing with breaches of workplace rules.  Depending on the manner in terms of which the relevant workplace rule has been breached, various items of Schedule 8 of the LRA would be applicable.  What is the approach to be adopted to determine which items of Schedule 8 are applicable when judging the statutory fairness of an employer’s conduct?

_____________________________________

Scenario 1: misconduct

  • If the employee breached a workplace rule with fault (intentionally or negligently) and in a wrongful manner, then, in essence, the employee committed misconduct
  • Misconduct generally is to be treated in terms of items 1 to 5 and 7 of Schedule 8.
  • On the other hand, misconduct, entailing the participation in an unprotected strike and the collective withdrawal of labour, is to be dealt with in terms of items 6 and 7 of Schedule 8

Scenario 2: ill-health/injury

If the employee fails to comply with a workplace rule in a faultless scenario (i e without intention or negligent) but still wrongfully, and the basis for non-compliance with such workplace rule is his/her ill-health or injury, then items 10 and 11 of Schedule are applicable.

Scenario 3: poor-work performance

  • Scenario 3 is similar to scenario 2, but the only difference is that the reason for such non-compliance is not the ill-health/injury of the employee, but the employee’s poor work performance.
  • Treating an employee for poor work performance is thus the default position if non-compliance with a workplace rule has not been established on the basis of ill-health/injury and such non-compliance is faultless – items 8 and 9 of Schedule 8 of the LRA are then applicable.

Section 41(2) of the BCEA regulates the entitlement of an employee, dismissed for reasons based on the employer’s operational requirements, to severance pay.

In terms of s41(4) of the BCEA, an employee, who unreasonably refused to accept the employer’s offer of alternative employment with that employer or any other employer, is not entitled to severance pay ito s41(2).

How does the assistance provided by the retrenching employer to a retrenched employee affect such employee’s entitlement to severance pay?

What is the short test to be applied to determine whether there is compliance with the reasonable decision-maker test?

When determining whether or not the arbitrator of the CCMA or bargaining council behaved like a reasonable decision-maker, what are the ‘questions to be asked’?

What is the test recently applied to determine whether an arbitration award should be set aside on review?

In the scenario where a group of employees, participating in a demonstration, picket, strike, etc, are participating in unlawful conduct, but a number of other employees, who are also participating in such demonstration, picket, strike, etc, are not participating in such unlawful conduct, will the employer be entitled to obtain an interdict against both groups of such employees?