Skip to main content

Article 36/2024

LabourEdge

Is an employer entitled to rely on s68(1)(b) of the LRA to claim compensation for losses suffered during a protected strike/lockout?

_____________________________________

  • Section 68(1) of the LRA reads as follows:
    • In the case of a strike or lock-out, or any conduct in contemplation or in furtherance of a strike or lock-out, that does not comply with the provisions of this Chapter [Chapter IV], the Labour Court has exclusive jurisdiction –
      • to grant an interdict or order to restrain…
      • to order the payment of just and equitable compensation for any loss attributable to the strike or lock-out, or conduct, having regard to – …’ (underlining and insertion provided)
  • In Blinkwater Mills (Pty) Ltd v FAWU (2020) 31 SALLR 161 (ML); (2020) 41 ILJ 837 (ML), the high court held that any loss attributable to a strike or lockout, where such strike or lockout is protected, s68(1)(b) of the LRA is not applicable and the scenario is not covered by a statutory cause of action – it further held that such claim is to be based on the principles of a delict (the loss must be caused by the unlawful, intentional/negligent action or omission and the extent of the loss determines the quantum of the claim).
  • However, in Massmart Holdings Ltd and Others v SACCAWU (2022) 33 SALLR 274 (LC), the labour court recently, per Van Niekerk J, held that s68(1)(b) of the LRA is to be interpreted to cover the scenario where the loss is attributable to an unprotected strike/lockout or conduct in contemplation or furtherance thereof, as well as a protected strike/lockout or conduct in contemplation or furtherance thereof.

Precautionary suspensions

In the public sector, the Senior Management Service Handbook (SMS Handbook) directly addresses precautionary suspensions and the 60-day time limit.

Clause 2.7(2)(c) of the SMS Handbook provides that ‘If a member is suspended or transferred as a precautionary measure, the employer must hold a disciplinary hearing within 60 days. The chair of the hearing must then decide on any further postponement.’

Regulation 6 of the Local Government: Disciplinary Regulations Senior Managers, 2010 (Regulations) provides for the precautionary suspension of senior municipal employees and Regulation 6(6)(a) provides: ‘If a senior is suspended, a disciplinary hearing must commence within three months after the date of suspension, failing which the suspension will automatically lapse.’

What are the principles governing a determination of the question as to whether or not a senior municipal employee’s suspension automatically lapses in terms of the aforesaid Regulation 6(6)(a)?

Obviously, the answers to the aforesaid question are very relevant in the private sector where, firstly, a collective agreement regulates a similar process or, alternatively, such contractual rights have been created between the parties, to be enforced in terms of s77(3) of the BCEA.

In the previous article, we dealt with the consequences of a plant level collective agreement with a definite beginning and end date. We indicated to you that, in line with s23(2) of the LRA, and an analysis of the relevant case law, that, once such a collective agreement reaches its expiry date, it expires and is no longer of any force or effect. In this article, we deal with the scenario where a plant level collective agreement is concluded for an indefinite period and the employer gave notice to terminate same.

What are the consequences when a party to a plant level collective agreement, concluded for an indefinite time period, gives notice to terminate such collective agreement?

In terms of s23(2), a collective agreement binds, for the whole period of the collective agreement, every person so bound in terms of s23(1)(c) (the members of a registered trade union and the employers who are members of a registered employers’ organisation who are a party to the collective agreement, if the collective agreement regulates the terms and conditions of employment, or the conduct of the employers and employees) who was a member at the time it became binding, or who becomes a member after it became binding (irrespective of whether or not that person continues to be a member of such trade union or employers’ organisation for the duration of the collective agreement).

What is the relevant case law development as to a plant level collective agreement that has an expiry date, i e does such collective agreement continue to be of force and effect after such expiry date?