Article 34/2024

LabourEdge

What are the principles regulating demotion as an alternative sanction to dismissal and how is the jurisdiction of the CCMA affected by the agreement of the employee to such sanction?

_____________________________________

The labour court (Solidarity obo Taliep v Perishable Products Export Control Board and Others (2022) 33 SALLR 81 (LC); [2022] 12 BLLR 1141 (LC)), per Kahanovitz AJ, stated the following in respect of such demotion:

  • the agreement by the employee, that demotion is the alternative to dismissal, does not oust the jurisdiction of the CCMA, seeing that the CCMA is not asked to set aside the agreement but to decide on the existence of an unfair labour practice (Builders Warehouse (Pty) Ltd v CCMA (PA1/14) [2015] ZALAC 13 (5 May 2015))
  • the agreement by the employee also does not entail that the dismissal is fair
  • the mere consent is not sufficient to satisfy the requirement of fairness
  • in terms of TOWU obo Malan v Commuter Handling Services (Pty) Ltd 2006 (3) BALR 327 (CCMA); (2006) 17 (7) SALLR (CCMA), the requirements for procedural and substantive fairness, with regard to demotion, are equally applicable to demotion as the primary sanction, or, alternatively, the secondary sanction (i e an alternative to dismissal)
  • and, finally, with reference to Egerton v Mangosuthu Technikon (2002) 23 ILJ 2111 (CCMA), it was held that the agreement to be demoted, as an alternative to dismissal, does not imply the waiver of a right to challenge the fairness of the demotion as a sanction

What is an employer to do when it suspects that a medical practitioner is issuing pre- signed sick notes, or permitting its employees to buy sick notes, or, alternatively, is engaging in some other dubious practice regarding the issue of sick notes? What is an employer to do when it suspects that a person is not entitled to practice as a medical doctor?

Are you required to interpret any of the following: pre-trial minutes, strike ballot guidelines, the LRA, a separation agreement, a benefits dispute, an arbitration award, the BCEA, a restraint of trade, a traditional disciplinary enquiry charge sheet, the constitution of a trade union, etc?

The labour appeal court recently, in Murray and Roberts Cementation (Pty) Ltd v AMCU obo Dube and Others (2024) 35 SALLR 116 (LAC), confirmed important principles relating to the formulation of traditional charge sheets, determining the
fairness of a dismissal, the interpretation of a charge sheet and the reason(s) relied upon by the employer to justify the dismissal of an employee.