Skip to main content

Article 3/2023

An employee has a pre-existing injury. However, subsequently, he was involved in an accident at work which caused further injury.

Does the pre-existing injury affect compensation claimed by the employee for the latter injury?

_____________________________________

In Department of Labour: Compensation Commissioner v Botha (2022) 3 SALLR 17 (SCA), it is
submitted that the supreme court of appeal adopted the following correct approach:

  • the question to be determined is whether there is a causal connection between the subsequent
    accident and the disability
  • in order to determine whether or not such causal link is established, the approach adopted in
    Basson v Ongevallekommissaris [2000] 1 All SA 67 (C) is to be followed, entailing that a causal
    connection is established if the subsequent accident was a contributing factor, even if a pre-
    existing condition existed, i e the disability was exacerbated by the subsequent accident,
    rendering the employee disabled
  • once such causal link is established, that would entail the end of the ‘first enquiry’ and the
    ‘second enquiry’ is to be proceeded with in order to determine the extent that the pre-existing
    injury contributed to the disablement – in casu, the SCA found that it was impossible to establish
    such extent on the medical records before it and ordered the compensation commissioner to
    obtain such record and also provide the employee with the opportunity to obtain his own medical
    reports in this regard

The previous article dealt with plant level collective agreements, in essence, to be considered in terms of s23 and 24 of the LRA.

On the other hand, sectoral level collective agreements are to be dealt with in terms of s31, read with s32 and s33A, of the LRA.

In respect of such sectoral level collective agreements, the following questions are currently of relevance:
• who is bound by a sectoral level collective agreement?
• what is the difference between a plant level collective agreement and a sectoral level collective agreement?
• how are collective agreements concluded in a bargaining council extended?
• how are sectoral collective agreements enforced?

What are the requirements to be complied with for a plant level agreement to constitute a collective agreement?

In respect of plant level collective agreements, the following questions are currently of particular relevance:

• who is bound by a plant level collective agreement?
• how does a plant level agreement extend to employees who are not members of the registered trade union or registered trade unions party to the agreement?
• if a plant level agreement has a specific beginning and end date, for what period is it binding?
• under what circumstances does a plant level agreement vary a contract of employment of an employee?
• if a plant level agreement is for an indefinite period, how can it be terminated?
• how are disputes regarding plant level collective agreements resolved?

From the previous articles dealing with employment equity, it is evident that a designated employer should, amongst other things (in no sequence of importance):

• identify the correct sector within which it operates, so that it can align itself with the sectoral targets
• ensure that its EEA9 classification is correct
• choose the right EAP
• determine whether a person is a suitably qualified person – firstly, same providing a ground for deviation from an employment equity plan and, secondly, same providing a justifiable reasonable ground for non-compliance with targets.

But, how should a designated employer deal with its employment equity targets from 2025 until the end of 2030?