Article 27/2024

Subsequent to FA v University of Witwatersrand (2023) 44 ILJ 929 (CCMA), Standard Bank of South Africa v Zimbini Makuleni (JR2261/18), Makuleni v Standard Bank of SA Ltd (2023) 34 SALLR 71 (LAC), Centre for Autism Research and Education CC v CCMA and Others (2020) 41 ILJ 2623 (LC) and Gaga v Anglo Platinum Ltd and Others (2012) 33 ILJ 329 (LAC), it is possible to identify various types of workplace bullying.

What are some of the important principles applicable when considering workplace bullying?

_____________________________________

  • In the Standard Bank judgment (LC), Boda AJ indicated that workplace bullying is linked to a feeling of incompetence in handling a job, a sense of alienation from colleagues, anxiety that there will be no promotional recognition, a challenge to job security, feelings of inadequacy and the knock-on tensions in personal relationships – not even to mention depression.
  • With reference to the work done by Professor Alan Rycroft, Boda AJ provided the suggested definition of workplace bullying to include any unfavourable or offensive conduct on the part of a person or persons which has the effect of creating a hostile working environment.
  • Specific behaviours identified to constitute workplace bullying include the following: various forms of persecution, threats and inspiration of fear, degradation, deliberate insults, hypercritical negative responses or attitudes and offensive administrative penal sanctions (directed against an employee without any objective cause, explanations or efforts at resolving any underlying problems).
  • Distinction is to be made between direct/overt bullying when compared to indirect/covert bullying – the latter is subtler and aimed at harming people on an emotional level with the intention to inflict pain in a manner that can be denied at a later stage.
  • A serious form of workplace bullying is gaslighting – these are actions taken by the perpetrator to cause the victim to question him/herself and make the victim doubt his/her competence.
  • A specific type of bullying is gender bullying, distinguishable from the aforesaid general bullying, seeing that this occurs on gender lines – equally, bullying can also take place according to race, etc (i e constituting racial bullying, etc).
  • As a general rule, the sanction of dismissal is applicable, specifically if the offender denies the bullying and showed no remorse.
  • Apart from the aforesaid cases, SALLR delegates are required to have recourse to the CCMA information sheet on harassment, as well as the Code of Good Practice on the Prevention and Elimination of Harassment in the Workplace.

What are the principles governing the vicarious liability of an employer for acts committed by an employee in breach of the EEA, in terms of s60 of the EEA?

The scenario is as follows: only employees working at a bakery and not employees working at a mill were party to the disputes when referred to conciliation.  At arbitration, the union wanted to join the employees working at the mill.

Is such joinder permissible?

What is the test for unfair discrimination formulated in Harksen v Lane and consistently applied subsequently by the various courts, including, recently, Premier FMCG (Pty) Ltd t/a Blue Ribbon Bakery v FAWU (2022) 33 SALLR 277 (LC); (2022) 43 ILJ 1584 (LC)?