Skip to main content

Article 22/2025

With reference to Strategic Liquor Services v Mvumbi NO and Others 2010 (2) SA 92 (CC), National Health Laboratory Services v Yona and Others (2015) 36 ILJ 2259 (LAC) and Jordaan v CCMA and Others (2010) 31 ILJ 2331 (LAC), what is the content of the two-stage approach applicable to constructive dismissals, so recently confirmed by the labour appeal court in Sanlam Life Insurance v Mogomatsi and Others (2023) 34 SALLR (LAC)?

_____________________________________

STAGE 1

  • The employee must prove that the employer effectively dismissed him/her by making the continued relationship intolerable.
  • If an employee resigns because work has become intolerable, this does not amount to a constructive dismissal – the requirement is that the intolerability must be of the employer’s doing.
  • But, even if an employer is responsible for the relationship being intolerable, it may not be blamed – more is required.
  • The employer must be culpably responsible for the intolerability – the conduct of the employer must lack reasonable and proper cause.
  • Viewed objectively, it could not be reasonably expected of the employee to continue with the employment relationship.

STAGE 2

  • After a constructive dismissal is established in terms of stage 1, an evaluation at this stage is to take place as to whether or not the dismissal was unfair.
  • It is to be noted that these two stages might overlap and be interrelated.
September 28, 2026

What are the principles governing common purpose misconduct?

September 21, 2026

What are the principles governing an employee’s duty to disclose to his/her employer information about misconduct?

September 14, 2026

In Article 31, we dealt with the distinction between desertion and abscondment.

In Article 32, we dealt with the misconduct of deeming desertion.

In this article, we will deal with termination of employment by operation of law in the private sector – similar to deeming to be discharged in the public sector.