Skip to main content

Article 18/2025

What is an employer to do when it suspects that a medical practitioner is issuing pre- signed sick notes, or permitting its employees to buy sick notes, or, alternatively, is engaging in some other dubious practice regarding the issue of sick notes? What is an employer to do when it suspects that a person is not entitled to practice as a medical doctor?

_____________________________________

The labour appeal court, in Woolworths (Pty) Ltd v CCMA and Others [2024] 8 BLLR 881 (LAC); (2024) 45 ILJ 2270 (LAC), provided the following guidelines in the above regard:

  • the employer is required to investigate the matter and report it to the relevant authorities, including the Health Professions Council of South Africa, the South African Medical and Dental Council and the Health Science Academy (if the practitioner holds a dispensing certificate);
  • the idea that an employee, who happens to go to a doctor who is not trusted (or a person suspected of not being a medical practitioner), must be subjected to a disciplinary process for utilising the services of such person is rejected – at the very least, the employer should investigate these suspicions and, if the suspicions are well-founded, the employee should be warned against using the particular doctor;
  • at all relevant times, the investigation into the alleged conduct should be conducted by the relevant entities as identified above.

The previous article dealt with the distinction between misconduct constituting desertion and misconduct constituting abscondment – see, further, in this regard, Okhahlamba Local Municipality v Mabuya (2021) 32 SALLR 12 (LC).

In this article, what we attempt to do is provide some clarity as to a very different misconduct, namely, the misconduct of deeming desertion.

What is the difference between desertion and abscondment?

We think that everyone understands that an employer is vicariously liable for the wrong committed (an act or omission) by its employee during the course/scope/sphere of employment/engagement in any activity reasonably incidental to it.

But, what is the extent of an employer’s vicarious liability where the employee commits a wrong on his or her own volition?