Skip to main content

Article 12/2024

LabourEdge

What is the viewpoint of the labour appeal court, as expressed in SA Municipal Workers’ Union obo Morwe v Tswaing Local Municipality and Another [2023] 2 BLLR 131 (LAC); (2022) 33 SALLR 60 (LAC) as to the question as to whether or not the labour court only has jurisdiction during the existence of a contract of employment and not once it has been terminated?

_____________________________________

The labour appeal court, in the aforesaid judgment, adopted the following approach:

  • s77(3) of the BCEA confers on the labour court concurrent jurisdiction with civil courts
  • the limitation exists in respect of matters concerning a contract of employment
  • whatever a civil court can hear ‘concerning a contract of employment’ is what the labour court can hear, and this is not limited to contracts which are in existence and have not been terminated
  • thus, a dispute concerning a contract of employment covers disputes whether the contract has been validly cancelled or has been breached
October 19, 2026

Section 41(2) of the BCEA regulates the entitlement of an employee, dismissed for reasons based on the employer’s operational requirements, to severance pay.

In terms of s41(4) of the BCEA, an employee, who unreasonably refused to accept the employer’s offer of alternative employment with that employer or any other employer, is not entitled to severance pay ito s41(2).

How does the assistance provided by the retrenching employer to a retrenched employee affect such employee’s entitlement to severance pay?

October 12, 2026

What is the short test to be applied to determine whether there is compliance with the reasonable decision-maker test?

When determining whether or not the arbitrator of the CCMA or bargaining council behaved like a reasonable decision-maker, what are the ‘questions to be asked’?

What is the test recently applied to determine whether an arbitration award should be set aside on review?

October 5, 2026

In the scenario where a group of employees, participating in a demonstration, picket, strike, etc, are participating in unlawful conduct, but a number of other employees, who are also participating in such demonstration, picket, strike, etc, are not participating in such unlawful conduct, will the employer be entitled to obtain an interdict against both groups of such employees?