Skip to main content

Article 11/2026

Which principles regulate the choice of economically active population (EAP) where a designated employer operates in more than one province?

Which principles govern the election of EAP where the predominant/major part/ majority of the operations of the designated employer exist?

_____________________________________

The aforesaid principles are to be extracted from EEA8 and EEA12.

EEA8

Scenario 1: where the designated employer operates in more than province

  • The designated employer must consider the nature of its operations and the geographical area(s) of its operations.
  • It must choose either the national or regional EAP for the analysis in terms of s19 of the EEA (inclusive of its EEA plan and reporting).

Scenario 2: where the designated employer operates in more than one province and the predominant/major part of its operations is in one province

  • The designated employer is to choose the EAP of that province.
  • Nevertheless, it must have regard to the EAP of the different provinces within which it operates, when setting EE targets.

EEA12

Scenario 1: where the designated employer operates in more than one province

  • It must consider the nature of its operations and the geographical area of its operations.
  • It can choose either the national or provincial EAP for each province in which it operates.

Scenario 2: where the designated employer operates in more than one province and the largest part of its operations is conducted in one province

  • It may choose the EAP of that province.
  • Nevertheless, it must have regard to the EAP of the other provinces within which it operates, when EE targets are set.
  • Designated employers using either the national or provincial EAP of a province, where the majority of their operations are, must nevertheless have regard to the variations between the EAPs of the different provinces when setting EE targets.
  • Designated employers must use the EAP chosen for the entire duration of the EE plan for the relevant 5-year sector targets.
  • The analysis of the workplace must be based on a snapshot of the employee distribution in various occupational levels on a particular date ito race, gender, disability, per occupational level on that date.

Concluding remarks

  • In terms of both EEA8 and EEA12, designated employers operating in more than one province may elect to choose either the national or regional (provincial) EAP for conducting the required analysis, preparing an EE plan and reporting to the Department.
  • EEA8 refers to the predominant or major part of the operations of a designated employer located in one province, whereas EEA12 refers to the majority part of the operations in one province – in both these instances, the designated employer must nevertheless have regard to the variations between the EAPs of the different provinces when setting targets to achieve equitable representation of employees from designated groups in all occupational levels.
  • Likewise, both in respect of EEA8 and EEA12, when a designated employer uses the national EAP, it must nevertheless also have regard to the above variations.
  • The true question to be determined is what constitutes the scenario entailing that the predominant/major/largest part of the employer’s operations is located in a specific province. Unlike the scenario in terms of Regulation 9(7) of Gazette 2, that specifically states that, if a designated employer operates in more than one sector, it should apply the numerical targets for the sector in which the majority of employees are engaged, a similar provision is not found in Gazette 2, dealing with this identified issue.
  • The viewpoint is held that, where such designated employer operates in more than one province, what will determine whether a predominant/ major part/largest part of the employer’s operations is located in a specific province will undoubtedly include whether or not the majority of its employees are employed in a specific province. What is uncertain is what role, if any, the following factors would play in identifying a predominant/major part/largest part of the employer’s business:
    • revenue
    • clients/customers
    • operational presence
    • considerations of the core business of the employer versus its non-core business, such as sales and distribution, etc
August 17, 2026

We think that everyone understands that an employer is vicariously liable for the wrong committed (an act or omission) by its employee during the course/scope/sphere of employment/engagement in any activity reasonably incidental to it.

But, what is the extent of an employer’s vicarious liability where the employee commits a wrong on his or her own volition?

August 10, 2026

What is the content of traditional consensus to indicate that an agreement exists between an employer and an employee?

If, on the traditional theory of consensus, a party fails to prove an agreement upon which it relies, with reference to Sonap Petroleum SA (Pty) Ltd v Pappadogianis 1992 (3) SA 234 (A), on what basis can a finding be made that quasi-mutual assent exists, founded on the approach that a party is precluded from denying the existence of an agreement based on their own conduct and the circumstances?

What does the three-fold enquiry entail to determine the presence of quasi-mutual assent?

In determining whether an agreement has been reached in the absence of traditional consensus, but on the basis of quasi-mutual assent, what is the extent of the duty on the party wishing to rely on such an agreement to, on the basis of reasonableness, enquire as to the contradictions that exist in the position of the other party so contained in correspondence?

August 3, 2026

Where do delictual claims fit into dispute resolution options applicable to employment disputes?